Saturday, November 5, 2016
Sunday, October 9, 2016
Saturday, October 8, 2016
Sunday, September 25, 2016
Dating in India: The 'wrong man' can mean death | Stuff.co.nz
Dating in India: The 'wrong man' can mean death | Stuff.co.nz
This is truly disturbing. A lot of men have difficulty handling the emotional impact of a woman spurning them.
The remedy to all this and I do see a remedy here, is relationship education -- and not for men only but for both men and women.
There are emotionally damaged people of both genders or sexes out there in the world. I myself had an ex-girlfriend tell me that I allowed myself to be used by Satan to make fun of her and of her family.
She had spent about a week or two trying to get me to go back with her. When I refused, she felt scorned to the edge of fury. Fortunately, she limited her reaction to telling me off.
Thirty-something years ago, I was harassed by my first girlfriend who spent three months trying to get me back before she finally gave up and moved on with her life. I was very relieved when that finally happened. I don't want another person's misery on my conscience.
And there have been cases of men who have even been murdered by female stalkers who just wouldn't accept that their male lovers or temporary boyfriends wouldn't continue seeing them.
Of course, it's more frequent or more frequently reported that stalking cases revolve around a man stalking a woman who wanted to move on and unwittingly bruised his ego.
Such persons need to be educated to understand that they don't need another human being to be complete. There is no better half or lesser half.
When a couple forms from two people, that is a couple formed from two complete persons and not two halves coming together as one. One flesh is created by two only after those two formally marry each other -- not before.
As for approval seeking, you don't base your self-worth on another person's opinion of you. You don't need it. It's nice to be liked but you will be far better off basing your self-worth on the knowledge that God knows you and loves you just the way you are. As for the opinions of other people of you, that's all they are, opinions.
People would be less likely to end up turning into stalkers if they were de-brainwashed from all that approval-seeking that was imposed on them during childhood.
I have far more thoughts on this but because of time and space constraints, I'm stopping here by concluding that people need to be educated into learning how to relate to each other before they jump into relationships with others.
This is truly disturbing. A lot of men have difficulty handling the emotional impact of a woman spurning them.
The remedy to all this and I do see a remedy here, is relationship education -- and not for men only but for both men and women.
There are emotionally damaged people of both genders or sexes out there in the world. I myself had an ex-girlfriend tell me that I allowed myself to be used by Satan to make fun of her and of her family.
She had spent about a week or two trying to get me to go back with her. When I refused, she felt scorned to the edge of fury. Fortunately, she limited her reaction to telling me off.
Thirty-something years ago, I was harassed by my first girlfriend who spent three months trying to get me back before she finally gave up and moved on with her life. I was very relieved when that finally happened. I don't want another person's misery on my conscience.
And there have been cases of men who have even been murdered by female stalkers who just wouldn't accept that their male lovers or temporary boyfriends wouldn't continue seeing them.
Of course, it's more frequent or more frequently reported that stalking cases revolve around a man stalking a woman who wanted to move on and unwittingly bruised his ego.
Such persons need to be educated to understand that they don't need another human being to be complete. There is no better half or lesser half.
When a couple forms from two people, that is a couple formed from two complete persons and not two halves coming together as one. One flesh is created by two only after those two formally marry each other -- not before.
As for approval seeking, you don't base your self-worth on another person's opinion of you. You don't need it. It's nice to be liked but you will be far better off basing your self-worth on the knowledge that God knows you and loves you just the way you are. As for the opinions of other people of you, that's all they are, opinions.
People would be less likely to end up turning into stalkers if they were de-brainwashed from all that approval-seeking that was imposed on them during childhood.
I have far more thoughts on this but because of time and space constraints, I'm stopping here by concluding that people need to be educated into learning how to relate to each other before they jump into relationships with others.
Saturday, September 24, 2016
Saturday, May 21, 2016
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Dr. Carol Williams plays Pipe Organ with Drums-Improve on In A Gadda Da ...
I just had to share this video. It would have been a crime to have kept it all to myself.
Monday, May 16, 2016
Saturday, May 14, 2016
Sunday, May 1, 2016
Achieving Harmony – Summary of Thinking Techniques - Allowing-others-to-be-as-they-choose-to-be
Achieving Harmony – Summary of Thinking Techniques
Euchariste Says, "Achieving Harmony – Summary of Thinking Techniques," Saltori, https://saltori.com/footsteps/allowing-others-to-be-as-they-choose-to-be/
Euchariste Says, "Achieving Harmony – Summary of Thinking Techniques," Saltori, https://saltori.com/footsteps/allowing-others-to-be-as-they-choose-to-be/
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Saturday, April 9, 2016
Thursday, April 7, 2016
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
Saturday, March 26, 2016
Sunday, March 6, 2016
Friday, March 4, 2016
Sunday, February 28, 2016
MECANO ME CUESTA TANTO OLVIDARTE
The song is downright so sweet to the ear that it hurts. Actually the plot hurts even more. It's a song about a woman who's having trouble in her struggle to forget a lost love. She's made up her mind not to return to him and that it's over but she's paying a mighty high price for her decision, one that she's determined to stick with regardless how painful it may be.
Saturday, February 27, 2016
New DOJ Statistics on Race and Violent Crime
New DOJ Statistics on Race and Violent Crime: Numbers finally include Hispanics as an offender category.
Unhinged Black Lives Matter Co-Founder Says "All Lives Matter" Is A Slur
''''
White lives matter every bit as much as the lives of black persons.
The lives of people of other races also matter no less than the ones mentioned already. If this leader of the Black Lives Matter would have others take her and her claims seriously, she had better change her rhetoric's tone.
She's alienating a large number of otherwise friendly people who take African Americans seriously. If she, Ms. Johnson continues with her belligerent tone, a whole lot of people will wind up running into the arms of those whose very purposes are of destroying the power of her movement.
If I were her, I think I'd listen to John Lennon's Revolution. Its logic addresses this lady's rhetoric quite soundly.
Friday, February 26, 2016
Latin American Herald Tribune - VenEconomy: A Very Delicate Matter for Venezuela
Latin American Herald Tribune - : A Very Delicate Matter for Venezuela
What caused all this trouble in the beginning?
What ushered in the age of Hugo Chavez, the trouble of Venezuela's current crisis?
I'll tell you. You have this huge multitude of economically broken and ignorant people in Venezuela full of resentment against the earlier government. They voted in Chavez expecting him to fix the Venezuelan trouble, their miseries, their ignorance.
They put Chavez in power by way of the "Hate Vote" against his predecessor. By hating the earlier government so much they put in power a demagogue who ran their country and them all into the ground. And this current boss president, Nicolas Maduro, has been even worse.
The country of Venezuela run into the ground by Chavez and kept mown down is the consequence of ignorant poor people using their powers erroneous by attaching their voting powers to hate. Hate ran Venezuelan and the people down into the ground and it's done it deep.
What caused all this trouble in the beginning?
What ushered in the age of Hugo Chavez, the trouble of Venezuela's current crisis?
I'll tell you. You have this huge multitude of economically broken and ignorant people in Venezuela full of resentment against the earlier government. They voted in Chavez expecting him to fix the Venezuelan trouble, their miseries, their ignorance.
They put Chavez in power by way of the "Hate Vote" against his predecessor. By hating the earlier government so much they put in power a demagogue who ran their country and them all into the ground. And this current boss president, Nicolas Maduro, has been even worse.
The country of Venezuela run into the ground by Chavez and kept mown down is the consequence of ignorant poor people using their powers erroneous by attaching their voting powers to hate. Hate ran Venezuelan and the people down into the ground and it's done it deep.
Thursday, February 25, 2016
Biden From ’92: President Should 'Not Name A Nominee Until After The Nov...
This article follows from something I did yesterday. Yesterday, I put a link in Facebook from a Petition website that exhorts the US Senate to delay the confirmation of the Supreme Court Justice destined to replace the late Antonin Scalia.
My action was challenged by a friend of mine who took exception to my move. He stated that my exhortation to the Senate to continue delaying the confirmation of this replacement was an exhortation to defy the US Constitution.
He strongly believes that the Senate is morally and legally obligated to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice now and not wait until a new US President begins serving.
The Democratic Party's US President, Barak Obama, insists on nominating a replacement Supreme Court justice for the late Antonin Scalia before his term as President ends early next year. The US Constitution gives him that authority. No one doubts about that.
The Constitution also gives authority to the United States Senate to delay confirming a replacement for this late Supreme Court Justice. I don't think that Senate Majority Leader would have dared take that position if he did not know he had such constitutional powers available to him.
Moreover, the Senate of the nation has constitutional powers giving it the authority to do that in its separation of powers clause.
This is a very controversial conflict going on and it's happened in the past. It happened several times in fact. President Tyler dealt with an obstructionist Senate in his efforts to put in a Supreme Court justice after a predecessor died.
Currently, we have a Democratic president in power who wants to put in a liberal Supreme Court Justice with the passing of Justice Scalia. We have a Republican-controlled Senate saying "Not so fast, Mr. President. There's a presidential election due this year and the replacement for Justice Scalia will have to wait till the next US President is inaugurated in 2017. And it won't be you, Sir, Mr. Obama."
This situation obviously rattles Obama at seeing his mouthwatering opportunity to again influence the Supreme Court being dangled in front of him by fate and not being able to eat any of it. It must really rile him and many liberal Democrats that this is now happening.
The Senate now has fifty four seats in Republican control whereas the Democrats hold forty six seats. The Senate Majority Leader is Mitch McConnell whereas the Senate Minority Leader is Harry Reid.
The confirmation process were it to begin now, would take place in the Senate Judiciary Committee being chaired currently by Iowa Republican Senator Charles Grassley.
The US Senate although currently controlled by Republicans has a Democratic Party President who is the current US Vice President Joseph Biden of Delaware. Mr. Biden was a Senator himself from when he won the seat in 1973 until he stepped down in 2009 to serve as US Vice President.
During his period as US Senator for Delaware, he rose to chairman of both the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee before that between 1987 to 1995.
The Democrats view the Senatorial refusal to confirm now as an obstruction on the part of the Republican leadership that now prevails there.
Yet, back when the current Vice President, and Vice President to President Obama who's the president eagerly seeking a replacement for Antonin Scalia, Joseph Biden, was the Chairperson for the Senate Judiciary Committee, the President then was George Herbert Walker Bush, a Republican.
And during that time, the US Senate was controlled by Democrats who numbered fifty seven and the Majority Leader then was George Mitchell of the State of Maine. Chairing the Senate Judiciary Committee was the current Vice President of the country, Joseph Biden.
Why am I talking about Joseph Biden when he was Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman in 1992?
What does all this talk of Joseph Biden have to do with what's going on now with Obama wanting to replace Antonin Scalia and the Republicans who control the Senate not letting him do that? I'll give you a clue.
My action was challenged by a friend of mine who took exception to my move. He stated that my exhortation to the Senate to continue delaying the confirmation of this replacement was an exhortation to defy the US Constitution.
He strongly believes that the Senate is morally and legally obligated to confirm the next Supreme Court Justice now and not wait until a new US President begins serving.
The Democratic Party's US President, Barak Obama, insists on nominating a replacement Supreme Court justice for the late Antonin Scalia before his term as President ends early next year. The US Constitution gives him that authority. No one doubts about that.
The Constitution also gives authority to the United States Senate to delay confirming a replacement for this late Supreme Court Justice. I don't think that Senate Majority Leader would have dared take that position if he did not know he had such constitutional powers available to him.
Moreover, the Senate of the nation has constitutional powers giving it the authority to do that in its separation of powers clause.
This is a very controversial conflict going on and it's happened in the past. It happened several times in fact. President Tyler dealt with an obstructionist Senate in his efforts to put in a Supreme Court justice after a predecessor died.
Currently, we have a Democratic president in power who wants to put in a liberal Supreme Court Justice with the passing of Justice Scalia. We have a Republican-controlled Senate saying "Not so fast, Mr. President. There's a presidential election due this year and the replacement for Justice Scalia will have to wait till the next US President is inaugurated in 2017. And it won't be you, Sir, Mr. Obama."
This situation obviously rattles Obama at seeing his mouthwatering opportunity to again influence the Supreme Court being dangled in front of him by fate and not being able to eat any of it. It must really rile him and many liberal Democrats that this is now happening.
The Senate now has fifty four seats in Republican control whereas the Democrats hold forty six seats. The Senate Majority Leader is Mitch McConnell whereas the Senate Minority Leader is Harry Reid.
The confirmation process were it to begin now, would take place in the Senate Judiciary Committee being chaired currently by Iowa Republican Senator Charles Grassley.
The US Senate although currently controlled by Republicans has a Democratic Party President who is the current US Vice President Joseph Biden of Delaware. Mr. Biden was a Senator himself from when he won the seat in 1973 until he stepped down in 2009 to serve as US Vice President.
During his period as US Senator for Delaware, he rose to chairman of both the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee before that between 1987 to 1995.
The Democrats view the Senatorial refusal to confirm now as an obstruction on the part of the Republican leadership that now prevails there.
Yet, back when the current Vice President, and Vice President to President Obama who's the president eagerly seeking a replacement for Antonin Scalia, Joseph Biden, was the Chairperson for the Senate Judiciary Committee, the President then was George Herbert Walker Bush, a Republican.
And during that time, the US Senate was controlled by Democrats who numbered fifty seven and the Majority Leader then was George Mitchell of the State of Maine. Chairing the Senate Judiciary Committee was the current Vice President of the country, Joseph Biden.
Why am I talking about Joseph Biden when he was Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman in 1992?
What does all this talk of Joseph Biden have to do with what's going on now with Obama wanting to replace Antonin Scalia and the Republicans who control the Senate not letting him do that? I'll give you a clue.
The shoe was on the other foot back then. For the Democrats it was advantageous to prevent the Republican President then from getting a Supreme Court Justice of his choice get confirmed - especially since 1992 was a presidential election year and the Democratic Party's candidate, William Jefferson Clinton, was expected to defeat the Republican sitting President Bush.
So we have the very same situation taking place but with the Democrats and the Republicans occupying reversed roles.
What's this about me and others like me exhorting the Senate to ignore or obstruct their constitutional duties to replace Scalia when back in 1992, a high ranking Democratic Party Senator and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman advocated on the Senate floor the very same thing I am petitioning the Senate to do now?
You can't have it both ways, Mr. Obama. You just can't delay the confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice when your party controls the Senate and then expect your wishes to be honored when your opponents control the Senate and you're the President seeking to put in a new Supreme Court Justice and there's a new Presidential election this very year.
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
User blog:Mira Laime/How to Deal With a Bad Bureaucrat - Community Central - Wikia
User blog:Mira Laime/How to Deal With a Bad Bureaucrat - Community Central - Wikia
I thought I'd share this article for those of you who resent abuse from people who like to push their weight around.
I understand perfectly well that this article is written to address people who have some grief with someone inside this community. However, the psychology of dealing with an abusive bureaucrat applies to everybody and everywhere. Not just to an online community.
Sometimes, you have to stick it to the man who's bad but I don't think you should seek to stick it to anyone just to get an ego satisfaction.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Anytime you have to stick something to someone, do it as an act of self preservation. It's better to walk away from a fight than to fight for the sake of fighting.
Remember if you're doing waging war against someone, you can inflict some painful damage but if you're doing it to someone just to prove you can do damage, realize that they can come back and hurt you even worse.
If you're out to make someone lose face because they did that to you, they're going to come after you.
The ego's just not worth it.
I thought I'd share this article for those of you who resent abuse from people who like to push their weight around.
I understand perfectly well that this article is written to address people who have some grief with someone inside this community. However, the psychology of dealing with an abusive bureaucrat applies to everybody and everywhere. Not just to an online community.
Sometimes, you have to stick it to the man who's bad but I don't think you should seek to stick it to anyone just to get an ego satisfaction.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Anytime you have to stick something to someone, do it as an act of self preservation. It's better to walk away from a fight than to fight for the sake of fighting.
Remember if you're doing waging war against someone, you can inflict some painful damage but if you're doing it to someone just to prove you can do damage, realize that they can come back and hurt you even worse.
If you're out to make someone lose face because they did that to you, they're going to come after you.
The ego's just not worth it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)